Published On: 20 March, 2012|By |

I’ve been meaning to get in the habit of reviewing books after I’ve read them. Problem is, I don’t read the sorts of books most people review. So I wanted to explain my approach to reading.

Cutting edge is good?

My approach to reading is based on the premise that newer does not equal better. In fact, I assume the opposite. I assume that of the thousands of books that are published in 2012, hundreds at best will be worth investing my time in reading.

I do not say that because I think the books aren’t valuable and full of knowledge worth having. I say that because of the following scary reality: Outside of my academic studies, I read 20 books in 2011.

A life is made up of only so many books

Twenty books is probably more than I’ve read in the average year previously. But taking that as an average, assuming a 70 year lifetime, and assuming the health to read until the day I die, I will read 800 more books in my life. Max. And only 400 of them will be before I’m 50.

That reality sobers me. There will probably be 400 books published this month alone. Yet I can think of dozens of books written before 1800 that I really should make the effort to read before I die.

So I feel that of the thousands of books that will be published in 2012, only a very few of them should be priority reading for me. I would much rather read the stand-out books from 2011 or 2000 or 1990 this year than to try to ride the wave of the cutting edge. After all, it will be difficult during 2012 to tell which 2012 books are really worth reading. But I suspect in 2022, it will be a lot clearer.

Reading representatively

So my approach to reading tends to be more representative. I want to read key books that represent key streams of thought. There is the odd topic that I want to read in depth. Very rarely I will be able to read almost exhaustively on a topic. But my goal is to read broadly and representatively.

Why read broadly? Well, there are many reasons. But one reason is that I don’t consider myself to really understand a view deeply until I’ve read proponents of that view. It’s no use reading Cessationists defending Cessationism and then seeking to address the major Continuationist lines of thinking in our day. One must actually read his opponents before he can credibly argue against them. This requires reading all sorts of books by all sorts of people.

So why review?

Why should I review a book that’s been out for twenty or thirty years? Well, since the blog phenomenon is a recent development, I suppose many older books would have a fairly limited store of online reviews. So my reviews are designed to help others judge which books might be beneficial to them.

Additionally, I will try to make it a habit to review books whether or not I appreciate them. My goal in this is not to be unnecessarily negative, but rather to provide a counterpoint to the mainstream thinking.

Grace to you.

 

About the Author: Jason Harris

Jason loves to communicate God's word both in the local church and at conferences and retreats. Jason has been involved with Worship Music since 1996 and InFocus since 2005. Jason has degrees in theology, music, accounting, and research and is currently a PhD candidate and lecturer in the College of Business, Law, and Governance at James Cook University, Cairns. Jason is also a pastor at CrossPoint Church. You can contact Jason at jason@jasonharris.com.au.

2 Comments

  1. David LaVeque 21 February, 2014 at 5:03 pm - Reply

    hi Jason,
    I’m a new reader here and have enjoyed many of your articles.I have the same philosophy when studying any particular subject.I think alot of people are afraid to read the opposeing view and there are somepeople who actually would discourage that practice.The Catholics actually have a list of books that are forebiden.It is called:Index Librorum Prohibitorum.I have run into pastors who have frowned at me when I told them of some of the books I have read.Like an unwriten rule has been broken somehow.And speaking of books,I sent you an email and was under the wrong assumption that your new book was on a different topic.I will find it when time permits.I hope that you are haveing some success in getting it out to the market.Perhaps in the future you will write some theological works,that can tranlate to a book later on.Maybe you have,and i just have’nt found them yet.Well,be blessed.
    Dave LaVeque

  2. Jason Harris 17 May, 2014 at 6:08 pm - Reply

    Thanks for the comment. Here’s a link to the theological works I’ve published so far… http://www.amazon.com/Jason-Harris/e/B0080TG9DA/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1

    God bless.

Leave A Comment

Share This Article!